Who I write like meme
Jul. 16th, 2010 01:40 amEither this is hopelessly unscientific...or am I just my own little army of one?
Okay, so...hopelessly unscientific it is.
skaredykat forwarded me the info that this is a scam to get you to boost Google ratings for a vanity publisher. Or to get you to use a vanity publisher. Either way = ew! Please to not be following the links. If you want to know who you write like, I am more than capable of giving you some random writer's name after lightly perusing any of your work. Links to stupid site have been sanitized for your protection. (And retitled, for your amusement.) :D
SGA ficlet Under the Weather
SPN Drabble What Are You Doing?
Chapter One of SPN story The Gift
I'M SOOOO ASHAMED!!!!!
Okay, so...hopelessly unscientific it is.
SGA ficlet Under the Weather
SPN Drabble What Are You Doing?
Chapter One of SPN story The Gift
I'M SOOOO ASHAMED!!!!!

no subject
Date: 2010-07-16 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 03:33 am (UTC)Why don't they just call me a talentless hack with misogynistic, stuck-in-the-50s tendencies and be done with it?
GEEZ!
:>
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:16 am (UTC)Although, it is good to know that there's no basis for their accusation that I write like that Twilight hack. :grin:
I'll report it back to whose journal I saw it in, and leave a warning on the post. Stoopid scammers can't leave us alone. GrrArgh!
(*man, that's a funny face*)
Hey, I'm working on something I think you'll enjoy. Intrigued?
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:19 am (UTC)(*jumps up and down*) intrigue me, intrigue me, please!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:31 am (UTC)I haven't even read her work and I can tell she's a hack! That's how big a hack she is. What a relief to know that it was just random 1s and 0s. :>
Remember where I said I was up to a list of 20?
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:49 am (UTC)I just wish I'd thought of her author modifier, too. Hmm, maybe I'll steal her idea and credit her in the same breath?
(Watch this space for another edit.)(Or the space above, anyway.)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:52 am (UTC)How do you like it now?
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 07:58 am (UTC)re: Meyer
Date: 2010-07-17 08:06 am (UTC)Though I liked this and this.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:07 am (UTC)Warn anybody you think needs to know, please. :D
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:09 am (UTC)Why? I'm ornery.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:32 am (UTC)I'm answering in random order.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:33 am (UTC):chuckles:
Re: Meyer
Date: 2010-07-17 08:35 am (UTC)I'm often wrong, but still I believe.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:38 am (UTC)overrated so linear are conversations!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-17 08:42 am (UTC)I did actually comment on the PSA post with links to the entertaining banner modifications from you two, but then I deleted it out of worry of being rude(r than usual)...